AFTER SAME SEX MARRIAGE-WHAT IS NEXT       
Monday , December 08, 2003

The decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court that ruled Wednesday, November 19, that the ban on homosexual marriage violates the state constitution, sent shock waves across the land. Is there any question that the Humanist Manifestos is being fulfilled in America by liberal courts? The 4-3 ruling declares that homosexual couples have a constitutional right to marry. How can they declare this when there is nothing in the constitution that gives the judiciary this power?

These are militant jurists and if we want to protect marriage as a union between one man and one woman we must be willing to actively get involved. Liberal judges know the majority of Americans are against same sex marriage but they have an agenda.

Our nation has lost its way. We should be telling homosexuals their behavior is wrong and show them the way to freedom – but we have churches that in many cases endorse homosexuality.

We are told by reports today that many of our youths are becoming AIDs infected and that AIDs is rapidly increasing in the homosexual, bisexual, and drug communities.

AIDs is preventable. Abstinence, when not in a married relationship is the answer. Think of the billions of dollars spent on AIDs today. It is up to the church and followers of Jesus Christ to tell homosexuals the truth, not give them some false sense of security that can lead to death. We tell smokers today to give up smoking.

Marriage was ordained by God. It perpetuates the human race. It is health and security for children. Homosexuality was condemned in the Old Testament and in the New Testament. (Leviticus and Romans)

Senator Rich Santorum was in a firestorm with the media because he said, overturning the anti-sodomy ruling would lead to the “right” to bigamy, polygamy, and incest. He was right. These behaviors are dysfunctional and already someone has stepped forward demanding the right to polygamy. What is next? Marriage between a father and a daughter? Or worse – a father and a son!

In an effort to stop the legitimizing of homosexual marriage by either the Massachusetts commonwealth or the U.S. Supreme Court, the Federal Marriage Amendment has been placed on the front burner. The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) has 100 co-sponsors. Hopefully it will be brought up in January of 2004. Also, the Republican Governor’s Association has endorsed FMA.

At the end of the day we all know that preserving traditional marriage is the right
thing to do, morally and politically. Please let your elected representatives know that they must preserve the traditional definition of marriage. Their decision can bring blessings or curses.

The Washington Comment line is:
(202) 456-1111