CYNTHIA
TUCKER IS MORALLY WRONG
Tuesday, March 16, 2004
I think I have heard and read it all on same-sex marriage and then
I am given a copy of Cynthia Tucker’s Atlanta Journal Constitution,
March 14, article and I am floored that anyone would give her a
platform from which to sprew her poison.
Her article this past Sunday was entitled “Blacks Flee Gays,
Can’t Flee AIDS.” The title alone is absurd because
blacks do not flee gays. Only recently the front page of the AJC
carried an article about how black homosexuals seek to live in Atlanta,
Georgia. Would black homosexuals want to come to Atlanta if some
in
the black community did not embrace them? I don’t think so.
But Ms. Tucker said the black community exhibited a “casual
homophobia” toward gays and it was this “knee-jerk bigotry”
that keeps black gays in the closet and contributes to the rise
of HIV! Give me a break.
Surely, she had a bad day and didn’t know what she was writing.
Has she ever considered that the reason black homosexuals do not
want to tell of their homosexual activities is because they know
it is immoral? The black community’s leadership needs to step
up to the plate and tell the world that the black civil right movement
does not compare to the homosexual community’s demand for
marital equality. The black community’s struggle for freedom
was a moral cause and a legitimate fight against discrimination.
In Leonard Pitts article in the March 13, Greensboro News and Record,
he quoted Hilary Shelton, Director of the Washington NAACP, as saying
the amendment outlawing same-sex marriage would discriminate. However,
Rev. Richard Richardson, Chairman of political affairs for the Black
Ministerial Alliance of Greater Boston said, “definitely marriage
as the union of a woman and a man
is not discrimination,” and continuing he said, “and
I find it offensive to call it that”
It appears the black community needs to hear from more levelheaded
black leaders like Rev. Richardson. He knows that to allow same-sex
marriage, black or white, is wrong and would ultimately destroy
the God ordained institution of marriage and family.
For Cynthia Tucker to say that protecting marriage as one man and
one woman keeps blacks in the closet and contributes to the rise
of HIV is asinine. Being a black American and being homosexual are
two different things. One can’t change his or her skin color,
but one can choose not be become a homosexual. And let me assure
you that to protect the institution of marriage between one man
and one woman will never keep a black homosexual in the closet.
Many black men for decades have discarded home, children, and the
institution of marriage.
Never forget friends, the homosexual agenda is to redefine the
family and it will cause the sanctity of marriage to become meaningless.
Homosexuals and lesbians, both black and white, want special benefits.
Have you stopped to think what legalizing same-sex marriage would
cost this country both financially and morally? We would never recover.
Why doesn’t Ms. Tucker ever consider the immoral consequences
to same-sex marriages? Why does she and others supporting the homosexual
agenda never consider the children who will be deprived of stability
and security in a home with a mom and dad?
|